source audio editor audacity has spyware

SOURCE AUDIO EDITOR AUDACITY HAS SPYWARE SOFTWARE

SOURCE AUDIO EDITOR AUDACITY HAS SPYWARE SOFTWARE

Why should I need somebody to know that I use the software in the first place? We have seen ample examples in society of how even the most innocent and trivial piece of knowledge can be used to its detriment. Even remote as the possibility may be (and, generically speaking) the fact that you are a user of the software could mean something to somebody. In this case, as a sound editor, most users should not need or want to have the application call home. You do your research and decide whether you take the risk of using the software or not. As an end-user, I would accept the fact that the software can fail or have an adverse effect if it is open source (i.e. I have to push back against the notion (apparently accepted by the author) that every single piece of software has to call home. defending the company from law enforcement demands), this only happens because there is a telemetry option in the first place. While I understand the need for the last bullet point (i.e. The argument that a sound editor has meta-data that law enforcement would even want is troubling regardless of the argument for it. What information is that and why exactly do they have to collect information explicitly for legal enforcement? Sure if they collect the debugging data which they explicitly list above, they might have to hand that information over if law enforcement comes knocking - no question there.īut they explicitly state that they also collect additional data purely for the purpose of 'For legal enforcement' which is what I'm confused by. So if they collect debugging data, then that data can be delivered to a law enforcement agency. The thing necessary for the survival of the company is to comply with warrants for any information that they might had. I've worked on software that was installed on millions of devices that did not collect any information and I don't see why that should suddenly be illegal. There is no law in effect that forces software developers to collect information about users is there?Ĭlearly given that up to the current release such data was not collected, I don't understand the claim that this is necessary for the survival of the company. If it doesn't, it won't likely be a company for long. Whether a privacy policy says so or not, the odds are rather good that any given company will comply with legitimate law enforcement requests. While that's certainly a broad category and not particularly well-defined, it's also a fact of life in 2021.

Source audio editor audacity has spyware